Showing posts with label Britain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Britain. Show all posts

Monday, 5 November 2012

El Alamein: The end of the beginning

World War Two remains a significant story within Britain’s history. To this day, the war is imbued in our political ideologue, our history curriculum, as well the many statues and monuments commemorating the fallen.

Yet, within the patriotism and remembrance, the story of significant battles is often lost. The Battle of Britain and D-Day are far more prominent and visceral in our imagination because they represent what we see on our screens on bank holidays and at Christmas. No one ever remembers the Eastern campaign in India and Burma. No one ever remembers El-Alamein.

Yet history dictates that among Agincourt, Blenheim and Waterloo, a battle that took place in the parched and desolate desert of Egypt remains one of Britain’s finest military moments. So what makes it so important and does it occurrence really deserve to be elevated among Britain’s most celebrated military victories?

November 1942, like any month since September 1939, had not been a particularly good for the allies. For Britain, the hurried retreat from the beaches of Dunkirk, as well as the capture of Singapore by the Japanese meant morale was deflated. Despite the American entry into the war in December 1941, the burden on British and Commonwealth troops was immense. In the East, the German army was advancing towards the oil fields of the Caucasus’s and Rommel’s Fifth Panzer division was heading towards Cairo and more lucratively, the oil fields of the Middle East.



It was by no means certain, but for Hitler to obtain a constant supply of fuel for the Wehrmacht then the war in Europe was consequentially over. The fate of British India would almost certainly be decided too. At the time, it was not only the British command in Cairo’s biggest concern, it was Churchill’s.

Only a couple years before, British troops based in Africa were successful in maintaining their ground and in fact conquering further. In 1941 they had driven a weak Italian army out of Abyssinia (modern day Ethiopia) as well as driving Mussolini’s forces back from Italian-occupied Libya. Yet, just as the Germans had conquered most of Europe, Hitler sent one of his most trusted and celebrated Field Marshals to resolve the problem, The Desert Fox, Erwin Rommel.

The introduction of Rommel made a huge difference to the Axis’s fortunes and gave a huge awakening to the British troops. Rommel drove the German army through British lines and within 150 miles of Cairo. Churchill saw how his commanders were being easily out-manoeuvred and losing ground quickly and at a heavy cost to the imperious Germans. The fall and subsequent retreat from the important port of Tobruk saw Churchill place Cairo, the Middle East and consequently Britain’s future war in the hands of one Bernard ‘Monty’ Montgomery.



Monty is now often recited for his tactical marvel in Egypt as well as his miscalculation at Operation Market Garden and the so-called bridge too far at Arnhem. Yet, his military career had begun as a humble junior officer in the trenches of World War One. He had seen the devastation to life and the ill-thought out planning of generals to gain or lose needless ground. Perceived as arrogant as well as a maverick, his clubbability found himself fans within the troops, yet unpopularity among fellow officers. Yet, for his dislike, Monty was an astute and forward thinking battlefield commander.

His plans at El-Alamein were by no means revolutionary, but he prepared well, he knew the lie of the land and more importantly he was able to convey this message to the troops. The subsequent victory as Churchill exquisitely told the House of Commons went down as history as the start of the fight back:

This is not the end. It is not even the beginning of the end. But it is, perhaps, the end of the beginning”.

However, for all its significance, El-Alamein is presented as one of Britain’s greatest military battles because it was probably the last time British victory when British commanders were fully in control (this includes the Falklands’ War). Military historians correctly point out that Montgomery’s fortune was to some extent secured because German lines had become too extended. The British Eighth Army had been preparing for the advance for almost three weeks. Not only were they well dug-in but had the higher ground. Even taking into consideration the events of the previous few months, this battle was not as significant as it was made out to be. The importance was not the battle, but the fact that the British had shown the Germans could be beaten.

Monty’s success should be recognised, but certainly not in Egypt and certainly not more than the British and Commonwealth troops that collectively became known as the Desert Rats. Monty’s significance as a commander must be for recognising that Britain’s role had been surpassed by the Americans. He recognised that Britain could no longer take the lead and as consequence must take some of the pain when leading British troops after the D-Day landings. The loss of almost 4,000 men at Caen during Operation Goodwood, though painful, reflected Montgomery’s foresight. It is to some extent unfortunate that the failure of Market Garden saw his reputation somewhat malaise. For others, his forthright and somewhat arrogant memoirs saw him try inflating his own significance to Britain’s war victory.

Today, tourist trips to the battlefield at El-Alamein are not overly subscribed to. The area remains just as isolated as it was 70 years before. Yet it should not undermine the importance of what occurred in those late months of 1942. Blenheim and Waterloo were more significant for Britain’s political standing and strength in the decades to come. El-Alamein lacked the grace and military nous of these victories, but certainly, this was a great moment and it was significant to how the war was won.

Saturday, 4 February 2012

A gay footballer?

The fight to combat discrimination in British football has made impressive inroads over the past twenty years. In the 1970s and 1980s, black footballers were ritually taunted by the crowds with malicious and demeaning attacks. The audible echoes of monkey chants and communal throwing of bananas on the pitch were common features of league matches. The former Crystal Palace manager Ron Noades once commented that black players were needed for their “skill and flair” but white players were needed as they brought “brains and common sense” to a team. Yet British football has moved on and the national side has done much to promote the anti-racism message. In fact, when England players have suffered abuse in Europe, it came to deem racism as unpatriotic and something we no longer did. British football is aware of its ugly history and cherishes how far the game has moved on. The high profile cases of Chelsea captain John Terry and Liverpool striker Luis Suarez, though shameful, highlights how infrequent these events are.

There are still instances of hate crime on the terraces, but many songs by fans are jovial. Welsh sides are besieged by chants of sodomising sheep, whilst Manchester United fans lionise their South Korean midfielder Ji-Sung Park with the song:

“Park, Park, wherever you may be, you eat dogs in your home country. You could be worse; you could be Scouse, eating rats in your council house!” – (Music – Lord of the Dance)

It does ask a question, that as the Premier League has become more cosmopolitan and diverse, both players and fans, why no footballer has yet to come out as gay.

There are believed to be around half a million professional footballers in the world and of them, only one has officially declared his homosexuality. Be it, Anton Hysen, an obscure Swedish player .Yet, the remainder stay quiet. Why?

In a recent study of fans, 90 per cent said that sexuality is irrelevant. What mattered to them was the performance on the pitch. There are examples of other sportsmen who have ‘come out’ and it appears not to have affected them. The England cricketer Steve Davies, Welsh rugby player Gareth Thomas and the former NBA player John Amaechi, all announced their sexuality. Similarly to football, basketball had no openly gay athletes so Amaechi, who decided to publish it through his autobiography, generated interest from the America media and from many of his fellow professionals.

Perhaps the legacy of England’s only gay footballer still haunts such players. Justin Fashanu, Britain’s first black £1 million player, voluntarily announced his homosexuality to The Sun in 1990; though many feel he was forced into it. It was apparently well known by his fellow professionals and his disapproving manager at Nottingham Forest, Brian Clough. Fashanu committed suicide in 1997 after allegations of sexual indecency in the US, though many believe the abuse he suffered during his playing days was a contributory factor.

Graeme Le Saux, the former Chelsea and England defender, endured years of homophobic taunting from fans and players, even though he wasn’t gay. On one occasion the Liverpool forward Robbie Fowler made a sexual suggestion to him on the pitch. Le Saux believed he got stick because he read The Guardian. From Le Saux’s account it emerges that ‘homophobic banter’ is widespread in the dressing rooms. Reaction to John Amaechi’s announcement was met with different responses in the NBA. Tim Hardaway said that he would want the player removed from his team. Charles Barkley didn’t see it as an issue. Whereas, Steven Hunter didn’t mind, as long as he didn’t make any advances.


The Professional Footballers’ Association (PFA) has launched a new campaign to highlight homosexuality in football, but it was only in 2010 when a similar scheme was withdrawn at the last minute. Agents and publicists have apparently advised footballers to refrain from outing themselves as it could have an adverse impact on their playing and marketing capabilities. To them football is still in the dark ages.

Historically, football evolved from the Victorian era as a tool for sexual restraint. Unlike rugby, where touching is part of the game, football represented a code of masculinity. Weakness was a sign of effeminacy. Hence, when footballers are called ‘poofs’ it is more subjective at a person’s weakness rather than their sexuality. Yet, this mentality has encroached throughout the whole sport. England defenders Ashley Cole and Sol Campbell are still ridiculed by opposition fans by stories that cannot be corroborated.

The fear from the terrace and the dressing room appear to be the stumbling block. Though, like the racism campaign, it will be interesting what happens on the day someone comes out.
Share

Widgets